Main Criticisms of the Cato Institute and the Mises Institute

Criticisms of the Cato Institute and the Mises Institute

The main criticisms of the Cato Institute and the Mises Institute are as follows:

Cato Institute



  • Criticized for being politically correct and not presenting a more balanced and worthwhile analysis on foreign policy issues, particularly in the Middle East.
  • Criticized for having a squishy stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is a departure from its legacy of speaking unpopular truths regarding foreign policy issues.
  • Criticized for not producing an abundance of op-eds and policy statements that examine the deeper causes of the latest bloody episode and assess the degree of culpability between Israel and the Palestinians.
  • Criticized for regurgitating biased, pro-Israel myths in its analysis of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • Criticized for having strident partisans of Ukraine among its analysts, who fully condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine and endorsed economic sanctions against Russia.

Mises Institute



  • Criticized for being explicitly politically incorrect and hardcore in its approach to libertarianism.
  • Associated with neo-Confederate positions and conferences on secession.

In summary, the Cato Institute is criticized for its stance on foreign policy issues, particularly in the Middle East, and for not presenting a more balanced and worthwhile analysis. The Mises Institute is criticized for being explicitly politically incorrect and hardcore in its approach to libertarianism, and for being associated with neo-Confederate positions and conferences on secession. Do follow Internshipslive for more information on various internship and job opportunities.

Please do not add external links

Post a Comment (0)
Previous Post Next Post